Insights & Articles

Medicare Part D redesign could reboot U.S. prescription drug market for cancer drugs, making pricing more value-based

With passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, the Medicare Part D (outpatient drug benefit) will be undergoing a comprehensive redesign, which will be implemented in 2025. There will be a dramatic shift towards payer responsibility of costs, particularly in the catastrophic phase of the Medicare Part D benefit.

 

Currently, during the calendar year there are four phases a Medicare beneficiary goes through when obtaining coverage of outpatient drugs: Deductible, initial coverage, coverage gap, and catastrophic. Here, catastrophic refers to the point when a beneficiary’s total prescription drug costs for a calendar year have reached a set maximum level. At present, the catastrophic threshold is set at $7,100. In a given year, once beneficiaries hit the threshold they will have spent $3,250 out of pocket, at which point they begin paying 5% co-insurance in the catastrophic phase.

Over a five-year period from 2016 to 2021, nearly three million enrollees in Medicare Part D spent above the catastrophic threshold at least once. And, currently more than 1.5 million beneficiaries are in the catastrophic phase. That number is expected to grow steadily in the coming years. Moreover, at present, spending in the catastrophic phase now accounts for about 45% of total Medicare Part D expenditures.

The redesigned Medicare Part D benefit features a $2,000 hard cap on beneficiary out-of-pocket spending. At the same time, there will be a massive shift in cost management liability in the catastrophic phase. Currently, Medicare picks up the tab for 80% of costs in the catastrophic phase (the government is essentially the reinsurer in the catastrophic phase); plans, 15%; and beneficiaries, 5%. In the restructured Part D benefit, starting in 2025, the drug manufacturer will be responsible for 20% of catastrophic costs; plans, 60%; Medicare, 20%; and Medicare beneficiaries, 0%.

This $2,000 cap will obviously reduce Medicare beneficiaries’ financial burden considerably, especially those who are prescribed high-priced specialty cancer drugs, many of which put them in the catastrophic phase by the end of January in a given year, with no limit on out-of-pocket expenditures. In all probability, the $2,000 cap will lead to more utilization of specialty drugs and better patient adherence.

The Part D overhaul will also force payers and drug makers to rethink their strategies vis-à-vis cancer drug pricing and reimbursement. Payers will have to strike a harder bargain with drug makers when purchasing specialty pharmaceuticals. As payers won’t be able to fully offset their higher burden of cost management by raising premiums – there will be a 6% annual cap on premium increases. There will very likely be increased use of utilization management tools. And, perhaps most importantly, a more competitive market with more use of utilization management tools, such as prior authorization, step edits, and quantity limits. Also more use of outcomes-based pricing models. Partnering with Lyfegen may be the solution for manufacturers and payers alike, as its platform can put users on the right track towards successful implementation of value-based pricing arrangements.

Historically, as new checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 agents, have gained approval – such as Jemperli (dostarlimab) in April of 2021 - price competition has not been a factor. This is extraordinarily unusual, given how relatively crowded the various oncology indications targeted by checkpoint inhibitors have become; from breast, renal, and colorectal cancer, to melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Several companies, including traditional ones like Lilly but also new entrants such as EQRx, are seeking to disrupt this space by offering lower-priced alternatives.

Outside the U.S., oncology drug pricing is generally heavily regulated. And, we observe that certain drugs may not be reimbursed by government (monopsonist) purchasers if there isn’t sufficient clinical benefit to justify the price. Moreover, in international markets, outcome- or value-based pricing strategies for cancer drugs are commonplace, which they aren’t yet in the U.S.

However, Medicare Part D restructuring alters the competitive landscape considerably. For high-priced specialty pharmaceuticals, in particular, it will become increasingly important for payers to contain costs by way of utilization management, promote the use of generics and biosimilars, and negotiate value-based prices. The Lyfegen Platform enables more efficient and transparent management of value-based drug pricing contracts by using intelligent algorithms to capture and analyze patient-level drug cost data.


About the author

Cohen is a health economist with more than 25 years of experience analyzing, publishing, and presenting on drug and diagnostic pricing and reimbursement, as well as healthcare policy reform initiatives. For 21 years, Cohen was an academic at Tufts University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Amsterdam. Currently, and for the past five years, Cohen is an independent healthcare analyst on a variety of research, teaching, speaking, editing, and writing projects.

BOOK A DEMO

Related blogs

Why Q1 Is Critical for Pharma Rebate Management

READ MORE

Why Q1 Is Critical for Pharma Rebate Management

The first quarter of the year is a pivotal time for the pharmaceutical industry. As budgets are finalized and contracts renegotiated, Q1 sets the stage for how effectively organizations manage rebates, optimize costs, and deliver value.

For those navigating the complexities of pharma rebate management, Q1 offers unique opportunities to streamline workflows, review existing agreements, and ensure every rebate maximizes its potential. This period isn’t just about planning, it’s about implementing smarter processes to stay ahead in an increasingly dynamic healthcare landscape.

Why Rebate Management Deserves Q1 Attention

  1. Reviewing Performance

Q1 is the ideal time to evaluate rebate performance from the previous year. Were the agreements aligned with expectations? Did they deliver the promised value?

By assessing past performance, teams can identify underperforming agreements and opportunities for improvement. This ensures resources are allocated to agreements that drive measurable results.

  1. Optimizing Current Workflows

Rebate workflows are often complex, requiring significant manual effort for tracking, reconciliation, and reporting. In Q1, organizations have the opportunity to implement systems that:

  • Reduce administrative burdens.
  • Automate repetitive tasks.
  • Provide real-time visibility into rebate performance.

Streamlining workflows early in the year creates efficiencies that save time and resources throughout the year.

  1. Negotiating Future Agreements

The first quarter is also critical for renegotiating rebate terms with manufacturers and payers. Updated contracts may include:

  • A move to outcome-based agreements, which tie rebates to specific performance metrics.
  • Adjustments to existing terms based on market changes.

Teams equipped with data from previous agreements are better positioned to negotiate terms that align with strategic goals.

The Role of Technology in Pharma Rebate Management

Technology is transforming how organizations approach pharma rebate management. Tools like those offered by Lyfegen enable teams to:

  • Automate workflows: Reduce manual effort in tracking and reconciliation.
  • Gain transparency: Access clear, real-time insights into rebate agreements.
  • Optimize decisions: Use data-driven analytics to evaluate and renegotiate agreements.

For example, Lyfegen’s platform simplifies rebate tracking and provides actionable insights, ensuring organizations maximize their rebate potential while minimizing inefficiencies.

Start your year smarter!

Q1 is the time to rethink and refine your approach to pharma rebate management. With smarter workflows, clearer insights, and a focus on data-driven strategies, your team can unlock measurable savings and operational excellence.

Book a demo today to discover how Lyfegen’s solutions can simplify your rebate workflows and set you up for success in 2025.

Read More

Rethinking Medicine Payments with Smarter Drug Rebate Management Solutions

READ MORE

Rethinking Medicine Payments with Smarter Drug Rebate Management Solutions

Rising drug costs continue to challenge healthcare systems worldwide. In the UK, the proposed Voluntary Pricing Access Scheme (VPAG) and the NHS’s Accelerated Access Collaborative (AAC) are clear signals of the need for sustainable, transparent approaches to branded medicine pricing. These frameworks aim to control costs through 2028 while ensuring patient access to innovative treatments. Drug rebate management solutions are key to navigating these evolving frameworks. By automating complex workflows, providing real-time insights, and streamlining rebate tracking, these tools reduce administrative burdens, enhance transparency, and unlock significant cost savings.

Key Benefits of Modern Drug Rebate Management Solutions

  1. Automation Simplifies Operations

Traditional rebate management involves resource-heavy processes prone to delays and errors. Modern drug rebate management solutions automate tasks like reconciliation, reporting, and contract tracking, enabling healthcare providers to focus on negotiating better contracts and ensuring compliance with policies like VPAG.

  1. Transparency Reveals Opportunities

Rebate platforms provide granular visibility into contracts, helping organizations identify cost-effective therapies and maximize rebate potential. This transparency aligns with NHS AAC’s goal of improving value and ensuring public funds are spent efficiently.

  1. Real-Time Data Drives Smarter Decisions

Access to live rebate and claims data allows stakeholders to evaluate agreement performance and adjust strategies quickly. With real-time insights, healthcare providers can ensure rebates are optimized, costs are minimized, and patient access is preserved.  

This capability supports NHS AAC’s commitment to accelerating access to innovative medicines while maintaining value for taxpayers.

  1. Faster Auditing Improves Accountability

Delayed reconciliation often creates inefficiencies and compliance risks. Modern drug rebate management solutions provide real-time rebate tracking and payment reconciliation, ensuring accurate auditing and faster resolution of discrepancies. These features are critical for meeting the transparency and accountability goals of initiatives like VPAG.

Why Now?

The VPAG and AAC frameworks prioritize:

  • Optimizing branded medicine spending while maintaining access to innovation.
  • Enhancing transparency for payers, providers, and the public.
  • Redirecting savings to high-impact therapies and improved patient care.

Modern drug rebate management solutions directly address these priorities by simplifying rebate processes, supporting compliance, and enabling healthcare providers to align with evolving regulatory frameworks.

Smarter Practices in Action

Lyfegen is an all-in-one platform designed to streamline rebate workflows, improve transparency, and deliver actionable analytics. By leveraging tools like Lyfegen, healthcare organizations can navigate regulatory changes like VPAG with confidence, ensuring efficient operations and measurable savings.

Looking ahead

As healthcare systems face rising costs and increasing complexity, adopting a modern drug rebate management solution is no longer optional, it’s essential. These tools provide the automation, transparency, and real-time insights needed to comply with frameworks like VPAG while driving cost savings and supporting innovation.

Ready to simplify your rebate workflows? Sign up for a demo today to see how smarter solutions can transform your strategy.

Read More