Insights & Articles

Exploring Value-Based Contracts: Featured Public Agreements in Canada, Denmark, and Brazil


For this blog, we chose select agreements in Canada, Denmark, and Brazil. Each of these agreements vary, and we chose them so you can see how manufacturers tackle market access for different drugs and regions. Value-based contracts in these markets speed patient access while sharing financial risk between pharma and payers—a win-win situation.

Trikafta (Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor, Vertex Pharmaceuticals).  

Indication: Cystic fibrosis

Country: Canada

Agreement type: Coverage with evidence development (CED), restricted coverage, outcomes-based guarantee.

Date: July 2022.  

The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health requires a 94% price reduction on the price of Trikafta, in order for the treatment to be cost-effective. Children with cystic fibrosis between the ages of 2–5 are evaluated after 1 year, to show that they benefit from the treatment. Patients must meet a number of criteria to be eligible for treatment, making the agreement a combination of coverage with evidence development, restricted coverage, and outcomes-based.  

Trikafta was already approved for use in children over 6 years of age, but conducting a clinical trial in children between two and five years of age was deemed “ethically challenging.” An uncontrolled trial however in this age group found that the treatment was well-tolerated and reduced biomarkers of the condition. To address unmet needs while acknowledging the lack of data in this patient population, a CED contract with a drastic price reduction was negotiated.  

Orkambi (lumacaftor/ivacaftor, Vertex Pharmaceuticals)

Indication: Cystic fibrosis

Country: Brazil

Agreement type: Restricted coverage, CED

Date: April 2024

The Brazil Health Ministry came to an agreement with Vertex to allow restricted access to this treatment while regularly monitoring patients at 30 days and 3 months after initiation of treatment. The agreement includes refunds is the treatment does not achieve desired clinical outcomes, aligning pricing with effectiveness.

Kalydeco (ivactafor, Vertex Pharmaceuticals)

Indication: Cystic fibrosis

Country: Denmark

Agreement type: Price-volume agreement; portfolio pricing

Date: October 2018

The Danish procurement body, Amgros, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, came to an agreement that provides access to a portfolio of drugs for cystic fibrosis, including Orkambi (lumacaftor/ivacaftor) and future therapies, in 2019. Despite this taking place five years ago, it’s a great example of portfolio-based pricing, where payers agree to pay a set fee for a group of related drugs. The more patients that use them, the lower the price per patient.  

Lynparza (Olaparib, AstraZeneca)

Indication: Ovarian cancer  

Country: Brazil

Agreement type: Restricted coverage, outcome guarantee

Date: May 2022

This agreement was made between AstraZeneca and private insurers throughout Brazil. The treatment is made available without additional costs to the patient and combines features of restricted coverage with outcomes guarantees. Continued coverage is dependent on achieving partial or complete response.  


Zolgensma (onasemnogene abeparvovec, Novartis)

Indication: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

Country: Brazil

Agreement type: Outcome guarantee, CED, installment payments

Date: December, 2022

Novarits’ gene therapy Zolgensma is reimbursed based on the need for additional evidence, referred to as coverage with evidence development. This involves using coverage as a means to obtain real-world evidence, to make up for the lack of robust patient data coming from the pivotal trial. The agreement also divides risk between payers and manufacturers , by tying reimbursement to outcomes achieved. Because of the therapy’s great potential to improve the quality of life of children living with SMA, the agreement allows eligible patients to quickly start receiving treatment.


Want to see the library for yourself? Book a demo today here: https://www.lyfegen.com/demo

Related blogs

How Technology is Transforming Drug Rebate Management

READ MORE

How Technology is Transforming Drug Rebate Management

The complexity of drug rebate management has grown significantly in recent years. With multiple rebate structures, evolving regulations, and limited visibility across the process, pharmaceutical companies and payers face increasing challenges in tracking, optimizing, and ensuring compliance in rebate agreements.

Traditional rebate management often relies on manual processes, spreadsheets, and siloed data sources—leading to inefficiencies, errors, and revenue leakage. But technology is changing that. Automation, real-time analytics, and centralized platforms are transforming how pharma and payers approach rebate strategies.

The Role of Technology in Rebate Optimization

Automation and AI

  • Eliminate manual data entry and reduce administrative workload
  • Enable real-time rebate tracking and forecasting for greater accuracy

Advanced Analytics and Predictive Modeling

  • Identify trends in rebate performance to shape better contracts
  • Enhance revenue predictability and inform smarter financial planning

Improved Compliance & Transparency

  • Align rebate operations with global regulatory requirements
  • Provide audit-ready reporting to reduce compliance risks

A Smarter Way Forward with Lyfegen

The future of rebate management isn’t manual—it’s intelligent, automated, and built for scale. That’s exactly where Lyfegen comes in.

Our Rebate Analytics Platform is designed to help both payers and pharmaceutical companies take control of growing complexity. With automation, analytics, and real-time insights at its core, Lyfegen enables your team to:

  • Track rebates effortlessly through a centralized, digital-first platform
  • Uncover missed revenue opportunities with clear, data-driven insights
  • Stay compliant with evolving regulatory requirements and audit-ready reporting
  • Move faster and smarter, eliminating the risks of spreadsheets and disconnected systems

Let’s make rebates work for you—not against you.

Payers and pharma leaders around the world are already using Lyfegen to recover lost revenue and gain full visibility into their rebate performance.

Now it’s your turn. 👉 Book a demo and see how Lyfegen transforms rebate management—starting today.

Read More

Gene Therapies: Negotiating the Priceless-Insights from the Lyfegen 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report

READ MORE

Gene Therapies: Negotiating the Priceless-Insights from the Lyfegen 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report

With price tags in the millions, gene therapies are redefining medicine—and reshaping how we negotiate access to it. For both payers and pharmaceutical companies, these breakthrough treatments present a shared challenge: how do you fund what feels priceless?

From Zolgensma to Hemgenix, gene therapies promise one-time cures for rare and life-threatening diseases. But the financial model behind them can’t follow the traditional playbook. These treatments call for a smarter, more collaborative approach to pricing—and that’s exactly what’s taking root.

Why Payers and Pharma Need a New Playbook

Unlike conventional drugs, gene therapies frontload their cost while delivering benefits over time. That disconnect forces a fundamental rethink of how pricing, reimbursement, and risk-sharing are handled.

According to the Lyfegen 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report, health systems worldwide are moving toward innovative agreements: outcome guarantees, installment plans, and subscription-based models. These aren’t just experiments—they’re becoming essential tools to balance patient access with financial responsibility.

For payers, it’s about managing risk while maintaining equity. For pharma, it’s about demonstrating value in a way that aligns with clinical reality. Either way, the direction is clear: shared risk, shared benefit.

Global Shifts That Are Shaping the Market

The trends are global and accelerating. In the United States, payers like Blue Cross Blue Shield and Medicaid are embracing outcome-based models for sickle cell gene therapies like Casgevy and Lyfgenia. Brazil’s Ministry of Health uses installment payments for Zolgensma, spreading risk over five years while tying reimbursement to real-world outcomes.

In Europe, countries like Spain and Italy combine restricted coverage with annual reassessments, ensuring that high-cost therapies are only reimbursed if they continue to deliver results.

The message? Pricing innovation is no longer a nice-to-have—it’s the only way forward.

How Lyfegen Bridges the Gap

At Lyfegen, we help payers and pharma move beyond the negotiation table—and into action.

• Our Agreements Library, the world’s largest digital repository of value-based contracts, helps you understand what others are doing and where the benchmarks lie.

• Our pricing simulation engine lets both sides explore scenarios before committing—making deals smarter from day one.

• And our automated platform handles everything from contract setup to rebate tracking, saving time, reducing risk, and driving transparency.

A Smarter Way to Fund the Future of Medicine

Gene therapies will continue to challenge the limits of what we think healthcare can afford. But with the right models and tools, both payers and pharma can find common ground—ensuring that innovation reaches the patients who need it most.

Curious about what’s next in drug contracting?

Download the 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report for exclusive insights, real-world examples, and global benchmarks.

👉 Get the full report now

Read More